ARTICLE
Law firms continue to invest heavily in workplace perks, but those benefits rarely drive the career decisions of top legal talent. While perks can enhance day-to-day wellbeing and productivity, the strongest recruitment and retention strategies are built on a firm's identity, compensation structure, and opportunities for career advancement.
A strong example of this can be found in London’s legal market. Apart from NQ salaries, perks have become one of the most talked about features of modern legal recruitment, with firms investing heavily in ways to improve the day-to-day lives of London’s leading lawyers. Having said that, for all the attention they receive, the very best lawyers do not make long-term career decisions based on perks. They make decisions based on firms with the strongest underlying proposition.
Workplace perks are now widespread, particularly at high-performing law firms where long hours and demanding schedules are the norm. These perks cover benefits ranging from subsidised meals and flexible working arrangements to pet-friendly workplaces, gym memberships, wellbeing allowances, and on-site massage therapy
At their best, perks can improve quality of life and support productivity, helping busy employees manage their limited time and energy; but it’s not enough on its own to attract the very best. Perks are not a recruitment strategy. They are a small part of a much wider recruitment strategy. Perks attract interest, but they don’t attract the very best talent. Identity, money, and career progression do.
When it comes to junior legal talent, for example, candidates want to understand what a firm stands for and how the firm delivers (or intends to deliver) on what it says – whether that’s private equity’s favourite law firm, the world’s leading litigation firm, or the best media & entertainment firm this side of Soho.
Branding is part of it, but there needs to be more, with a consistent message from what Marketing puts out, to what the Partners say at interview, and to what happens in the office from day to day.
Identity shapes how people work together, how decisions are made, and how success is recognised. It’s a firm’s North Star. The most successful firms have a strong sense of their identity. Where it’s ambiguous, even the most attractive benefits will not compensate.
It is worth noting that some (now scrapped) perks can be polarising and contrary to a firm’s market perception and identity. This is a place of work. Not a kennel.
Identity is important and it’s the most crucial aspect to any successful business, but so is a competitive salary.
Busy lawyers, working long hours, with demanding clients, and in highly pressurised environments understandably want to be paid fairly. They know their worth. Top US firms, especially, pay incredible salaries and they are transparent about what they are. You know what you will be paid this year and next and, in all likelihood, that salary will increase, as we’ve seen recently.
For ambitious people, career progression remains a defining consideration, especially as lawyers edge towards 5 PQE, with 6 PQE being the upper limit where most Associate roles are pitched. The legal profession is a structured career path, but the reality is often more complex, and climbing up the PQE ranks does not guarantee partnership.
Lawyers appreciate transparency about career progression. It helps to retain those lawyers destined for partnership, or it gives those who are unable to, for whatever reason, the opportunity, time, and space to find an alternative, whether that’s within the firm, at another firm, in-house, or outside of the legal profession.
When implemented thoughtfully, perks improve well-being and support performance. Perks do complement a strong core offering, but they will never replace a clear identity, big salaries, and career progression. Rather than an ever-expanding benefit package, firms should focus on the fundamentals – identity, money, and career progression. Top firms operate in a competitive marketplace for top talent. Substance will always win. Perks can attract attention, but they don’t on their own attract the best legal talent.